Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
BMJ Case Rep ; 15(6)2022 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1891767

ABSTRACT

A woman in her 50s who had been diagnosed with COVID-19 developed deep vein thrombosis in the left femoral vein extending into inferior vena cava (IVC). An IVC filter was placed to prevent fatal pulmonary embolism. Her respiratory failure subsequently deteriorated despite optimal mechanical ventilation and required venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) as a rescue therapy. Femoro-jugular VV-ECMO configuration was not suitable due to the IVC filter, hence a single-site venous cannulation using bicaval dual lumen (AvalonElite) cannula was selected. Placement of the Avalon cannula conventionally requires guidance by fluoroscopy or transoesophageal echocardiography, which were not feasible in COVID-19 patients. Hence, transthoracic echocardiography guidance was chosen. Guidewire looping into the right ventricle might lead to cannula malposition and imminent right ventricular rupture, but these could be detected by 'bending' sign. Transthoracic echocardiography could be a feasible guidance method for Avalon cannulation, nonetheless a thorough protocol should be followed to avoid cannula malposition during the procedure.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Cannula , Catheterization/methods , Echocardiography , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Female , Humans
2.
Artif Organs ; 46(8): 1659-1668, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1701591

ABSTRACT

In a multicenter, retrospective analysis of 435 patients with refractory COVID-19 placed on V-V ECMO, cannulation by a single, dual-lumen catheter with directed outflow to the pulmonary artery was associated with lower inpatient mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , COVID-19/therapy , Catheterization/methods , Catheters , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Humans , Retrospective Studies
3.
Echocardiography ; 39(2): 339-370, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1697847

ABSTRACT

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides advanced cardiopulmonary life support for patients in cardiac and/or respiratory failure. Echocardiography provides essential diagnostic and anatomic information prior to ECMO initiation, allows for safe and efficient ECMO cannula positioning, guides optimization of flow, provides a modality for rapid troubleshooting and patient evaluation, and facilitates decision-making for eventual weaning of ECMO support. Currently, guidelines for echocardiographic assessment in this clinical context are lacking. In this review, we provide an overview of echocardiographic considerations for advanced imagers involved in the care of these complex patients. We focus predominately on new cannulas and complex cannulation techniques, including a special focus on double lumen cannulas and a section discussing indirect left ventricular venting. Echocardiography is tremendously valuable in providing optimal care in these challenging clinical situations. It is imperative for imaging physicians to understand the pertinent anatomic considerations, the often complicated physiological and hemodynamic context, and the limitations of the imaging modality.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Respiratory Insufficiency , Cannula , Catheterization/methods , Echocardiography , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Humans
4.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 22559, 2021 11 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1526104

ABSTRACT

The pandemic of SARSCov2 infection has created a challenge in health services worldwide. Some scales have been applied to evaluate the risk of intubation, such as the ROX and HACOR. The objective of this study is to compare the predictive capacity of the HACOR scale and the ROX index and define the optimal cut-off points. Study of diagnostic tests based on a retrospective cohort. Composite outcome was the proportion of patients that needed endotracheal intubation (ETI) or died of COVID19 pneumonia. Discrimination capacity was compared by the area under the curve of each of the two scales and the optimal cut-off point was determined using the Liu method. 245 patients were included, of which 140 (57%) required ETI and 152 (62%) had the composite end result of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) failure. The discrimination capacity was similar for the two scales with an area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.71 and 0.72 for the HACOR scale for the ROX index, respectively. The optimal cut-off point for the ROX index was 5.6 (sensitivity 62% specificity 65%), while the optimal cut-off point for the HACOR scale was 5.5 (sensitivity 66% specificity 65%). The HACOR scale and the ROX index have a moderate predictive capacity to predict failures to the HFNC strategy. They can be used in conjunction with other clinical variables to define which patients may require invasive mechanical ventilation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Catheterization/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/complications , Cannula , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Noninvasive Ventilation , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Failure , Young Adult
5.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 114(8): 455-460, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1485586

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted on several aspects of health care services worldwide. The aim of the study was to determine its influence on the case volume, success rate and complication rate of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHOD: all patients who underwent ERCP one-year before and after applying COVID-19 safety measures at the Qena University Hospital were included. Data were collected from the patients' records, analyzed and compared. RESULTS: a total of 250 patients underwent ERCP between April 1st, 2019 and March 31st, 2021, and the mean age of participants was 52 ± 18 years. There was a 5 % increase in case volume after applying COVID-19 safety measures (128 vs 122) and the total procedure time was significantly shorter (42 vs 46 minutes, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in the overall success rate and complication rate. Procedure success significantly correlated with cannulation attempts and total procedure time in both groups, and serum bilirubin and cannulation time in the pre-COVID-19 patients and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in post-COVID patients. ERCP-related complications significantly correlated with cannulation attempts in both groups, and ALP, international normalized ratio (INR), cannulation time and total procedure time in pre-COVID-19 patients, and platelet count and amylase in post-COVID patients. Two patients were confirmed COVID-19 cases at the time of ERCP; therapeutic targets were achieved in both with a smooth post-ERCP recovery. Three out of nine ERCP team members caught a mild to moderate COVID-19 infection and recovered after receiving proper management. CONCLUSION: our result show that there was no negative impact of using COVID-19 safety measures and precautions on the case-volume, indications, overall outcome or complication rate of ERCP.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Adult , Aged , Alkaline Phosphatase , Catheterization/methods , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/adverse effects , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/methods , Humans , Middle Aged , Pandemics
8.
Blood Purif ; 50(3): 283-289, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-817873

ABSTRACT

In December 2019, cases of acute respiratory illness of unknown origin were reported in Wuhan, China. The disease is caused by "severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2". After identifying severe lung damage, injury to other organs, such as the kidney, has been identified. Peritoneal dialysis is a renal replacement therapy (RRT) and is at least as effective as other extracorporeal therapy options, with significant cost-effective advantages. However, this strategy is rarely used for the management of acute kidney injury in severe lung disease. In this review, we explore PD as an RRT strategy that may be a key instrument in countries and hospitals with limited access to all RRTs.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , COVID-19/complications , Pandemics , Peritoneal Dialysis , SARS-CoV-2 , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Acute Lung Injury/etiology , Ascitic Fluid/virology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Catheterization/methods , Containment of Biohazards , Cytokines/metabolism , Developing Countries , Disease Management , Humans , Infection Control , Inflammation , Medical Waste Disposal , Prone Position , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Treatment Outcome
10.
J Crit Care ; 60: 253-259, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-739900

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Critically ill patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) have high rates of line thrombosis. Our objective was to examine the safety and efficacy of a low dose heparinized saline (LDHS) arterial line (a-line) patency protocol in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this observational cohort study, patients ≥18 years with COVID-19 admitted to an ICU at one institution from March 20-May 25, 2020 were divided into two cohorts. Pre-LDHS patients had an episode of a-line thrombosis between March 20-April 19. Post-LDHS patients had an episode of a-line thrombosis between April 20-May 25 and received an LDHS solution (10 units/h) through their a-line pressure bag. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (pre-LDHS) and 30 patients (post-LDHS) were identified. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, including age (61 versus 54 years; p = 0.24), median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (6 versus 7; p = 0.67) and systemic anticoagulation (47% versus 32%; p = 0.32). Median duration of a-line patency was significantly longer in post-LDHS versus pre-LDHS patients (8.5 versus 2.9 days; p < 0.001). The incidence of bleeding complications was similar between cohorts (13% vs. 10%; p = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: A LDHS protocol was associated with a clinically significant improvement in a-line patency duration in COVID-19 patients, without increased bleeding risk.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/physiopathology , Catheterization/instrumentation , Heparin/administration & dosage , Saline Solution/administration & dosage , Vascular Access Devices/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/complications , Catheterization/methods , Cohort Studies , Critical Illness , Female , Hemorrhage/complications , Hemorrhage/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Thrombosis/complications , Thrombosis/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
11.
J Card Surg ; 35(6): 1180-1185, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-596751

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient selection and cannulation arguably represent the key steps for the successful implementation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Cannulation is traditionally performed in the operating room or the catheterization laboratory for a number of reasons, including physician preference and access to real-time imaging, with the goal of minimizing complications and ensuring appropriate cannula positioning. Nonetheless, the patients' critical and unstable conditions often require emergent initiation of ECMO and preclude the safe transport of the patient to a procedural suite. AIMS: Therefore, with the objective of avoiding delay with the initiation of therapy and reducing the hazard of transport, we implemented a protocol for bedside ECMO cannulation. MATHERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 89 patients required ECMO support at Hennepin County Medical Center between March 2015 and December 2019. Twenty-eight (31%) required veno-venous support and were all cannulated at the bedside. Overall survival was 71% with no morbidity or mortality related to the cannulation procedure. CONCLUSION: In the current pandemic, the strategy of veno-venous bedside cannulation may have additional benefits for the care of patients with refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome due to coronavirus-disease-2019, decreasing the risk of exposure of health care worker or other patients to the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 occurring during patient transport, preparation, or during disinfection of the procedural suite and the transportation pathway after ECMO cannulation.


Subject(s)
Catheterization/methods , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Hospital Mortality , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Safety Management/methods , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , China , Cohort Studies , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Critical Care/methods , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Patient Safety , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Point-of-Care Systems , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2 , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL